cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-2008, 05:45 PM   #41
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TripletDaddy View Post
This is all a moo point because it is highly unlikely that exie's claim is even accurate.

Where does he even get that statistic?

The sheer concentrations of wealth and population in states like California, Florida, New York, Illinois, Texas, Connecticut (wealth, not pops)....would make it highly unlikely that Utah leads the nation in any category.

I htink on a per capita or per household basis Utah is consistently at or near the top.

Are moo points horns? (I know, pot/kettle)
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 05:45 PM   #42
BarbaraGordon
Senior Member
 
BarbaraGordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
BarbaraGordon is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by creekster View Post
Compulsory? Or do you mean self-serving? Why is this different than a politician ('non-beleiver') giving $ to his pet cause? SHould we discount that due to its self-serving nature? Or if the donation is based on fervetn beleif, why is it different than anyone giving to a cause in which they fervently believe? This dichotomy is false.
It seems a little different when one's eternal well-being is affected.
BarbaraGordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 05:49 PM   #43
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon View Post
It seems a little different when one's eternal well-being is affected.

WHy? You are suggesting it is a self serving donation. Ok. Most politicans donate for self serving reasons. Some big donors give to have building named after them. Others give becaseu it makes them feel good; or feeds their ego. Many others donate for a stinkin' tax deduction, for cryin' out loud. I think eternal welfare holds up pretty well comapred to these. To somehow discount the validity of these contributions, especailly when they are as proportinately large as they are, and to implicitly defend a schmuck like Biden for only giving $300 becasue (presumably) his is genuine as compared ot someone paying 10% of groos strikes me as self-serving itself.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 05:49 PM   #44
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TripletDaddy View Post
This is all a moo point because it is highly unlikely that exie's claim is even accurate.

Where does he even get that statistic?

The sheer concentrations of wealth and population in states like California, Florida, New York, Illinois, Texas, Connecticut (wealth, not pops)....would make it highly unlikely that Utah leads the nation in any category.
Perhaps someone can Google better than me, but I came up with this link, which does say Utah is the highest per capita. Barbara will be pleased to see that Oklahoma is #2.

I have no idea if this web site is reputable or not, so take it for what it's worth.

http://www.charitynavigator.org/inde...w/cpid/523.htm
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 05:49 PM   #45
TripletDaddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
TripletDaddy can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by creekster View Post
I htink on a per capita or per household basis Utah is consistently at or near the top.

Are moo points horns? (I know, pot/kettle)
A moo point. It is like a cow's opinion....it doesn't matter.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

"Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte
TripletDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 05:53 PM   #46
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by creekster View Post
WHy? You are suggesting it is a self serving donation. Ok. Most politicans donate for self serving reasons. Some big donors give to have building named after them. Others give becaseu it makes them feel good; or feeds their ego. Many others donate for a stinkin' tax deduction, for cryin' out loud. I think eternal welfare holds up pretty well comapred to these. To somehow discount the validity of these contributions, especailly when they are as proportinately large as they are, and to implicitly defend a schmuck like Biden for only giving $300 becasue (presumably) his is genuine as compared ot someone paying 10% of groos strikes me as self-serving itself.
Wow, creekster. Nice.

People donate to causes they believe in. Obviously the church is a cause that active LDS members believe in. They want to support what they believe is the cause of God.

No one forcibly takes tithing from members, just like no one forces them to be chaste, kind, honest, or to follow any other commandment. It's offered, often at great sacrifice, as an exercise of faith.

To call it compulsory and self-serving is quite shallow.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 05:53 PM   #47
TripletDaddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
TripletDaddy can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
Perhaps someone can Google better than me, but I came up with this link, which does say Utah is the highest per capita. Barbara will be pleased to see that Oklahoma is #2.

I have no idea if this web site is reputable or not, so take it for what it's worth.

http://www.charitynavigator.org/inde...w/cpid/523.htm
I dont know how reputable it is, either, but at least it is a start. I can see a per capita analysis. I would have been shocked if it were simply bottom line dollars, which there would be no way Utah would be anywhere near the top.

This link seems to consider only the wealthy filers and as a ratio to overall investment assets, not the entire population as a whole. But I get the point.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

"Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte
TripletDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 05:54 PM   #48
BarbaraGordon
Senior Member
 
BarbaraGordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
BarbaraGordon is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
Perhaps someone can Google better than me, but I came up with this link, which does say Utah is the highest per capita. Barbara will be pleased to see that Oklahoma is #2.

I have no idea if this web site is reputable or not, so take it for what it's worth.

http://www.charitynavigator.org/inde...w/cpid/523.htm

That's not ranking what you think it's ranking. The fact that Oklahoma is #2 is a giveaway.

But I think Utah would be #1 either way.
BarbaraGordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 05:59 PM   #49
tooblue
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,016
tooblue is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon View Post
It seems a little different when one's eternal well-being is affected.
The desire to have one's name associated with an institution or edifice is not an desperate grasp at immortality?

Do you honestly believe that I unconsciously hand over 10% to the church; that I am unaware of exactly where it is going and what is being done with it? I've been called an idiot before but ...
tooblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 06:02 PM   #50
TripletDaddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
TripletDaddy can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tooblue View Post
The desire to have one's name associated with an institution or edifice is not an desperate grasp at immortality?

Do you honestly believe that I unconsciously hand over 10% to the church; that I am unaware of exactly where it is going and what is being done with it? I've been called an idiot before but ...
tooblue, I agree with you, but you do not know exactly where the money is going and what is being done with it.

no need to overstate things to make your point.

If you indeed do know exactly where your tithing was going, can you clue me in as to how I can track mine dollar for dollar?
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

"Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte
TripletDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.