Intellectual Honesty: SU v. FARMS

[All-American]

Originally Posted by SeattleUte

Seattle leads 10-7. The scared puppies are on his side.

Just like the scholars who aren't publishing anything on the book of Mormon are, in fact, speaking very clearly against it, right?

When did you start thinking that people not speaking were equivalent to people who are speaking in your favor?

[Indy Coug]

Originally Posted by All-American

Just like the scholars who aren't publishing anything on the book of Mormon are, in fact, speaking very clearly against it, right?

When did you start thinking that people not speaking were equivalent to people who are speaking in your favor?

That very fact seals SU's intellectually dishonest fate.

[All-American]

Originally Posted by Indy Coug

That very fact seals SU's intellectually dishonest fate.

Nah, billions of people who haven't disagreed with him yet can't be wrong!

[RockyBalboa]

Originally Posted by Archaea

spiritual subterfuge?

He's not trying to be spiritual at all. He's basing his claims on quasi-empirical analysis, carefully selecting his points while ignoring others.

It's basically a rhetorical battle for him.

As usual you missed my point. I'm not talking about his spirituality when I put the 2 said words up above together.

[creekster]

Originally Posted by Tex

Speaks volumes.

I'm too scared to respond to this.