09-12-2008, 08:57 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Finance Industry Accounting Shenanigans
I work for an agency that grants me access to the operations of much of the financial industry. I see reports (not made to the general public) of certain "holding" companies that have, say $1K in revenue and $30M in expenses. It's obvious that the entity exists only to shield the losses of its subsidiaries, so those subsidiaries can pad their annual and quarterly reports. And its not like these are isolated incidents either.
These kind of shenanigans send bad signals to investors, creating bubbles and the like. When the SEC increases regulations to create more transparency, the industry will devise new tactics. A regulation policy is like a security policy; it needs to constantly updated to fend off new viruses.
__________________
太初有道 |
09-12-2008, 09:05 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
Quote:
I think you are referring to "shells," which exist for structural purposes and do shelter losses. However, all gains and losses for subs would roll up to the consolidated return, so not sure what you mean about shells bilking the investing public.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
09-12-2008, 09:14 PM | #3 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,367
|
Quote:
Enron |
|
09-12-2008, 09:18 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
You have really been into these Jim Rome resets lately. I am glad because you are trying to mix things up a bit.
This wasnt one of your better ones because Enron is neither a holding company nor a shell. Your God one was really funny, though. Another recent classic line..."Spencer, let it go." That was good stuff.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
09-12-2008, 09:28 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Quote:
__________________
太初有道 |
|
09-12-2008, 09:43 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
Quote:
Again, are you sure you want to be using the term "holding company?" The situation you describe in your first post has nothing really to do with holding companies. Or even subsidiaries. I think you are talking about companies that use special purpose entities to shell-game losses and shelter tax. Enron was not engaging in shady deals with subs. Enron had shady dealings with SPEs (specifically, limited partnerships in the case of Enron). Also, in your hypo, the parent is shielding the losses of the subs so that the subs can pad their reports. That makes no sense. Do many subs file independent docs with the SEC? They are almost always part of a consolidated group. I agree with your general sentiment.......the point you make is the reason we have Sarbox now. I am just pointing out semantics.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
09-12-2008, 10:15 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Quote:
__________________
太初有道 |
|
09-19-2008, 06:46 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Quote:
__________________
太初有道 |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|