11-16-2007, 11:45 PM | #1 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Evidence suggesting CNN going soft on Hillary
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312003,00.html
Quote:
I suppose all the Reps will say it's a bad thing, whereas Cali, Woot, and our other leftist leaning posters will simply depict it as nothing extraordinary. It bothers me than "journalism" would encourage softballs, and ignore questions, which are especially relevant to Nevadans, namely the nuclear dump.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
11-17-2007, 01:18 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,502
|
Quote:
|
|
11-17-2007, 01:47 AM | #3 |
Resident Jackass
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roswell, New Mexico
Posts: 1,846
|
They had already asked about Yucca Mountain earlier in the debate, had they not? And what is the deal with questioners doing what exactly what is suggested and then complaining about it later?
As for softballs? One or two for levity is not a problem. More than that is egregious. |
11-17-2007, 03:37 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,964
|
It's not about softballs. CNN, like Fox News, is in the entertainment business. They don't make money unless people watch their shows, and people don't watch their shows unless they're entertaining. Not everything is a conspiracy.
__________________
...You've been under attack for days, there's a soldier down, he's wounded, gangrene's setting in, 'Who's used all the penicillin?' 'Oh, Mark Paxson sir, he's got knob rot off of some tart.'" - Gareth Keenan Last edited by non sequitur; 11-17-2007 at 05:51 PM. |
11-17-2007, 04:03 AM | #5 | |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
Quote:
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
|
11-17-2007, 03:00 PM | #6 |
Member
|
Personally I think it should be required that those...
leading the debates, and sitting on the panels should have their names listed on the screen with their party affiliation, their voting history for the past 3 elections, as well as who they are supporting for President.
To me that is the most disingenuous aspect to these so called debates. If I, a Romney supporter were to lead the debate, would it be fair for me to lob softballs and Mitt all evening while taking kill shots at the rest of the candidates? What about salting the crowd by asking them which way they are leaning right now so I can assure that the crowd is as pro Romney as possible for effect? This kind of thing really is frustrating. I honestly cannot stand watching these debates. Nobody wants to get down to brass tax and begin hashing out the details. Candidates really don't answer the questions that matter, and the ones they do answer, we already know what their response will be. I say hold the debate in a large venue such as a sports dome or arena. Let people in for free and don't sweat the political makeup of those showing up. Let the questions fly free and clear of any gate keeping nonsense. You could set up a tour of lets say 4 to 6 debates over the course of the Primaries, and make them mandatory for all candidates who are serious about becoming president. No backing out due to scheduling conflicts. Let the candidates sit comfortably and when questioned stand and deliver. Let the debate run a good two to three hours. Let the questions the public want answered be put into a bingo tumbola and spun around so that whatever comes up is what is asked regardless of how hard the question might be. You don't think this would be entertaining. Please, the ratings would blow away the cardboard crap that passes for a debate today. Last edited by DJRoss; 11-17-2007 at 03:06 PM. |
11-17-2007, 05:07 PM | #7 | |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
Quote:
Politicians are - as Goatnapper would so eloquently say - string pullers. If a candidate wants my vote, he/she damn well better give me a reason to vote for him/her.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
|
11-17-2007, 05:12 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
Quote:
Which news outlet anywhere is not tainted or biased? They all are. Except, of course, Pravda, which we all know is The Truth....
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
11-17-2007, 05:28 PM | #9 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
I actually prefer the BBC. But the fact that CNN told a student not to ask a relevant question but to ask a softball to make a candidate look good is disturbing. Let the student ask her question, not ask questions which are dumb and irrelevant. I don't see how fox put words into the student's mouth. Perhaps you can enlighten me. Hillary's stance on the nuclear dump may cause her to lose our few votes. I just wish it had been more highlighted.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
11-21-2007, 06:32 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where do you think?
Posts: 1,201
|
Wow, are you still cluelessly on the Billary Bandwagon? We don't need levity in these debates, damnit. We need real questions, that the candidates are required to answer. Give me a freaking break...diamnonds or pearls?
|
Bookmarks |
|
|