03-06-2006, 11:03 PM | #11 | |
Master
|
Re: Nominate your best authors by language
Quote:
__________________
Ernie Johnson: "Auburn is a pretty good school. To graduate from there I suppose you really need to work hard and put forth maximum effort." Charles Barkley: "20 pts and 10 rebounds will get you through also!" |
|
03-06-2006, 11:41 PM | #12 |
I must not tell lies
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,103
|
This morning I had a 4-hour flight to Boise (with layover in SLC) and reread The Great Gatsby for fun. It was my first since eleventh grade. I nominate Fitzgerald for early 20th century, old sport.
Everyone suspects himself of at least one of the cardinal virtues, and this is mine: I am one of the few honest people that I have ever known. Beautiful. |
03-07-2006, 02:26 AM | #13 | ||
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
Re: Nominate your best authors by language
Quote:
I like them both because I see their work for what I think it is: Cooper is much more descriptive and Twain is more clever, but both tell a heck of a story.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
||
03-08-2006, 04:39 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
|
I'm probably too dumb to participate in this but I'll put out one of my favorites.
English: David McCullough |
03-08-2006, 05:34 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
One of my favorite authors (although not THE best in the english language) is Kurt Vonnegut.
So it goes. Hugo's Les Miserable is fabulous, although I am not as enamored of his other works. |
03-08-2006, 06:29 AM | #16 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
By the way, my own view is that in terms of pure literary merit the Old Testament towers over the restof the "standard works." I was left with this strong impression when I read the four standard works straight through, and I think most scholars agree with this assessment, particularly with regard to the Pentateuch, or first five books of the OT.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
03-08-2006, 12:25 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
|
Why do think the Old testaments "Towers" over the rest of the standard works? I would like to hear your thoughts
__________________
Its all about the suit |
03-08-2006, 05:26 PM | #18 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
The Old Testament is painted on a broader canvas than any of the other works. This appeals to my personal taste in literature. (It is on the complete opposite end of the spectrum form the modern short story about suburban angst, etc.) There are the large scale battle scenes, miracles, etc. Also, it tells the entire story--admittedly gilded by myth, but the mythical element imparts its own truth in a way that pure facts cannot--of the western world during a time for which we have very little other history, and is incomparable in this respect. The Old Testament is also fraught with Shakespearean phychological and philosphical drama, depth, ambiguity and nuance where, in terms of the stories they tell, the other works tend to tilt more toward melodrama (particularly the B of M). Take for example the story of the Rebekah/Jacob/Esau triangle; how do you explain that story? Also, Job's famous words, "Naked I came into this world, and naked shall I go." These little stories were the source of Shakespeare's, Dostoyevski's, Melville's, etc. collective inspiration and genius. I see their works as almost a common text with the OT. Then there is the voice. Like the Illiad, the OT to me breathes the autentic voice of our forefathers and their tribalism. I love the savage tribalism, the bleak, pitiless world it evokes, etc. Somehow this seems to me a more authentic representation of the subject matter. Finally, there's something scary and Ahab like about the OT's protagonist, Jehovah, which I see as pure genius and to me deeply satisfying. He's crusty, emotional, and pure eloquence. Really he's an altogether different persona and personality than Jesus of the NT. This is not to say that I don't think the NT, particularly in the Gospels and Revelations, has many sublime parts. This is my inarticulate opinion, anyway.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
03-09-2006, 03:14 PM | #19 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Message deleted.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
03-09-2006, 11:38 PM | #20 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
OT has some very tedious passages IMO. On the other hand it has some of the coolest stuff too. Most human, most flawed--the legends of a people. They don't aren't trying to sell you their religion so much.
My favorite is probably the New Testament--the gospels and Acts. Paul I can do without. Hard for me to say about the BoM. I read most books once. At most, I may read a book twice. I read the BoM multiple times on my mission, and sort of burned out on it. I can't vouch too much for the literary style, but there does seem to be an earnestness and directness in the BoM that the others don't have. That's my opinion at least. Of course the greatest religious writing is yet to be produced. It will be the Mormon who is like unto Shakespeare and Milton. I'll let you know if I ever get around to it. |
Bookmarks |
|
|