09-13-2007, 04:25 AM | #31 | |||||
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Think about it this way. Assume that the surge is not producing the results initially forecasted and Petraus sees this. He comes before congress and announces to the world that the surge has failed and a change in strategy is necessary. Every media outlet in the world would run editorials about the brave General Petraus. Congressional Democrats would soak in his every word and create new words to praise him. Republicans would have no grounds to dispute his findings as they have already built him up as the only hope in Iraq. He would be guaranteed a position as Joint Chiefs or SecDef in the next Dem administration, which would inevitably happen due to this announcement. He would land a well-paid, cushy spot in a liberal think-tank to bide the time. His picture would be placed in the Wikipedia entry on integrity. He would have so much more to gain by taking this course of action than by lying to protect an unpopular president. The fact that he didn't do this means that he is either a lying fool or he is speaking a very close approximation to the truth. I don't think he's a lying fool. |
|||||
09-13-2007, 05:05 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
That's how I read it as well. There's no reason to believe that's the case, and there's certainly no reason to preemptively besmirch him before he's even spoken.
|
09-13-2007, 04:49 PM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where do you think?
Posts: 1,201
|
Quote:
People like you are a disgrace. Calling into question the integrity of a 4 star general, who by all accounts is an honorable man, and a great leader. Screw you. |
|
09-15-2007, 01:56 AM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South Jordan, UT
Posts: 1,799
|
Quote:
|
|
09-15-2007, 03:18 AM | #35 | |
Resident Jackass
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roswell, New Mexico
Posts: 1,846
|
Quote:
|
|
09-15-2007, 03:38 AM | #36 | |
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
|
Quote:
First, the bulk of the tension with Shinsecki and Taguba was with Rumsfeld. Although President Bush bears the responsibility of his SecDef's actions, Gates seems to be have a much better demeanor. He doesn't appear to have the same dogmatic and vindictive attitude as Rumsfeld. Second, the timing of the treatment of Shinsecki/Taguba is considerably different than would be the potential ill treatment of Petraus. The former two generals were relatively unknown on a national level until they bucked the administration. The subsequent actions of the administration toward these two fine men is what made them famous amongs political followers. In Patraus' case, he already has the trust and national recognition that he needs to shield himself. The administration and Congress have publicly placed their faith in him, thus limiting themselves to take any serious retributive measures for an honest, albeit negative, assesment. Now, I may be overemphasizing these two differences but I don't think they should be overlooked. Last edited by YOhio; 09-15-2007 at 03:53 AM. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|