cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-09-2008, 04:27 AM   #1
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default My favorite VP picks are out...

Mark Warner would have been my top choice, but he said he wouldn't accept a VP position. He will be a great Senator, so it is hard to feel too sad about his decision.

Jim Webb also would have been great. He said he is out. Webb had some controversial statements about women in the past that would have been difficult to get past, but he brought a lot of positive credentials to the table too.

At this point, I think my top choice would be Edwards, followed by Bayh. I don't think Obama will pick a woman (I think it would upset many Dem women if a woman was picked and it wasn't Clinton), so that would rule out Napolitano and Sebelius.

Richardson would be an interesting pick, but I doubt very much that he will be the choice. He has too many odd statement floating around.

Al Gore has been floated, but I don't think he would be interested.

I say 55% Edwards, 40% Bayh, 5% someone else.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 04:32 AM   #2
YOhio
AKA SeattleNewt
 
YOhio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
YOhio is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Edwards is a loser. He does absolutely nothing for the ticket. He was an ineffective senator and he has failed twice in a presidential campaign and once as a VP candidate. I fail to see any appeal in John Edwards.

He should go with Ted Strickland or Bayh. Ted Strickland helps Obama in Ohio and the Appalachian areas where he sorely needs help. He's a pretty conservative Dem and would be a nice moderate influence.
YOhio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 04:33 AM   #3
il Padrino Ute
Board Pinhead
 
il Padrino Ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
il Padrino Ute is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

YOhio makes the best argument for Edwards. If he can stop Obama's assault on the USA, he would be the right choice.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver

"This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB.
il Padrino Ute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 04:48 AM   #4
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YOhio View Post
Edwards is a loser. He does absolutely nothing for the ticket. He was an ineffective senator and he has failed twice in a presidential campaign and once as a VP candidate. I fail to see any appeal in John Edwards.

He should go with Ted Strickland or Bayh. Ted Strickland helps Obama in Ohio and the Appalachian areas where he sorely needs help. He's a pretty conservative Dem and would be a nice moderate influence.
Edwards is immensely popular with the segment of the party in the rustbelt that Obama particularly needs help with. I think the overall importance of the VP in getting votes is largely overstated, but Edwards has a ton of name recognition, is quite popular, and is a bright guy. He has lost as a presidential candidate twice, sure. That hasn't stopped people in the past who went on to be good presidents/VPs.

Bayh would also be very good. I would feel ecstatic to have him or Edwards on the ticket.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 05:05 AM   #5
YOhio
AKA SeattleNewt
 
YOhio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
YOhio is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
Edwards is immensely popular with the segment of the party in the rustbelt that Obama particularly needs help with. I think the overall importance of the VP in getting votes is largely overstated, but Edwards has a ton of name recognition, is quite popular, and is a bright guy. He has lost as a presidential candidate twice, sure. That hasn't stopped people in the past who went on to be good presidents/VPs.

Bayh would also be very good. I would feel ecstatic to have him or Edwards on the ticket.
I'll have to step aside in this thread. I cannot discuss John Edwards with any degree of objectivity. He is my least favorite politician in America.
YOhio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 05:22 PM   #6
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
Mark Warner would have been my top choice, but he said he wouldn't accept a VP position. He will be a great Senator, so it is hard to feel too sad about his decision.

Jim Webb also would have been great. He said he is out. Webb had some controversial statements about women in the past that would have been difficult to get past, but he brought a lot of positive credentials to the table too.

At this point, I think my top choice would be Edwards, followed by Bayh. I don't think Obama will pick a woman (I think it would upset many Dem women if a woman was picked and it wasn't Clinton), so that would rule out Napolitano and Sebelius.

Richardson would be an interesting pick, but I doubt very much that he will be the choice. He has too many odd statement floating around.

Al Gore has been floated, but I don't think he would be interested.

I say 55% Edwards, 40% Bayh, 5% someone else.
Oh please, please, not Edwards. I don't think it'd do Obama any good to have a Walmart/trade basher.

Bayh would be sweet; he is very pro-business.
__________________
太初有道
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 06:37 PM   #7
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCoug View Post
Oh please, please, not Edwards. I don't think it'd do Obama any good to have a Walmart/trade basher.

Bayh would be sweet; he is very pro-business.
I wouldn't be at all surprised to see Bayh be the pick. He makes sense on a lot of levels.

He was one of Clinton's biggest supporters and was able to get a lot of traction for Clinton where he campaigned. Bringing him in is a bit of an olive branch to Clinton fans (though they are coming around anyways, as expected). He is young, bright, charismatic and would be a great addition to the campaign.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 06:41 PM   #8
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCoug View Post
Oh please, please, not Edwards. I don't think it'd do Obama any good to have a Walmart/trade basher.

Bayh would be sweet; he is very pro-business.
Check out these polls with Edwards factored in as VP...

http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do...D?diaryId=6836
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 06:45 PM   #9
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Obama/Edwards is genius. You capture the liberals, intellectuals, blacks, xenophobes, working whites, and racists all in one ticket.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 06:56 PM   #10
BlueK
Senior Member
 
BlueK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,368
BlueK is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
Mark Warner would have been my top choice, but he said he wouldn't accept a VP position. He will be a great Senator, so it is hard to feel too sad about his decision.

Jim Webb also would have been great. He said he is out. Webb had some controversial statements about women in the past that would have been difficult to get past, but he brought a lot of positive credentials to the table too.

At this point, I think my top choice would be Edwards, followed by Bayh. I don't think Obama will pick a woman (I think it would upset many Dem women if a woman was picked and it wasn't Clinton), so that would rule out Napolitano and Sebelius.

Richardson would be an interesting pick, but I doubt very much that he will be the choice. He has too many odd statement floating around.

Al Gore has been floated, but I don't think he would be interested.

I say 55% Edwards, 40% Bayh, 5% someone else.
I thought Edwards already said he's not interested.
BlueK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.