cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Chit Chat
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2007, 04:30 AM   #1
il Padrino Ute
Board Pinhead
 
il Padrino Ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
il Padrino Ute is an unknown quantity at this point
Default A question for the attorneys here...

the other thread about prosecutors sparked this question:

What do you folks think about a guy like Bruce Cutler - John Gotti's attorney?

Isn't he the worst of the worst when it comes to evil lawyers, be they defense or prosecutors?
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver

"This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB.
il Padrino Ute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 01:06 PM   #2
UtahDan
Senior Member
 
UtahDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bluth Home
Posts: 3,877
UtahDan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
the other thread about prosecutors sparked this question:

What do you folks think about a guy like Bruce Cutler - John Gotti's attorney?

Isn't he the worst of the worst when it comes to evil lawyers, be they defense or prosecutors?
I don't know what specifically he did. Was it worse than those who defended the beltway snipers for example? Or the 12th hijacker or the shoe bomber?

I guess the question you start with is whether a person we all "know" is guilty is entitled to a trial and a defense. If they are, then are they allowed to have counsel who tries hard or who mails it in, hoping that his guy loses?

The real objection that I am hearing (not from you) is not with defense lawyers but with the 5th and 6th amendments.

You may have to let me know what the guy did. Suborning purgery, falsfying evidence, killing witnesses...this is what I think of with the mafia. If the lawyer is a willing accomplice, then yeah that is the worst.

I think the real objection I hear most of the time (not from you) is not truly to defense tactics but to the 5th and 6th amendments.
__________________
The Bible tells us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go. -Galileo
UtahDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 06:29 PM   #3
Detroitdad
Resident Jackass
 
Detroitdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roswell, New Mexico
Posts: 1,846
Detroitdad is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UtahDan View Post
I don't know what specifically he did. Was it worse than those who defended the beltway snipers for example? Or the 12th hijacker or the shoe bomber?

I guess the question you start with is whether a person we all "know" is guilty is entitled to a trial and a defense. If they are, then are they allowed to have counsel who tries hard or who mails it in, hoping that his guy loses?

The real objection that I am hearing (not from you) is not with defense lawyers but with the 5th and 6th amendments.

You may have to let me know what the guy did. Suborning purgery, falsfying evidence, killing witnesses...this is what I think of with the mafia. If the lawyer is a willing accomplice, then yeah that is the worst.

I think the real objection I hear most of the time (not from you) is not truly to defense tactics but to the 5th and 6th amendments.
Well put.
Detroitdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.