RS mtg. last night

[TripletDaddy]

Originally Posted by Archaea

RHG has a great point, why do we still have women's conference and priesthood sessions? At the priesthood sessions, it's a go on a mission and don't look at porn fest, along with, women are better than you. That forms the bulk of all discussions there. Thus with that as a trailer why have it?

After today, I would think that a "dont look at porn" talk is in order.

Here is an interesting challenge....as mods, can you or mike determine who clicked on any of the porn threads? And how many different times?

If so, I think it would be interesting to make the list public.

I didnt click on a single one, but I am religious, so of course I wouldn't.

[Archaea]

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

After today, I would think that a "dont look at porn" talk is in order.

Here is an interesting challenge....as mods, can you or mike determine who clicked on any of the porn threads? And how many different times?

If so, I think it would be interesting to make the list public.

I didnt click on a single one, but I am religious, so of course I wouldn't.

Yes DDD we can, and your thirty-two orders are appreciated.

[TripletDaddy]

Originally Posted by Archaea

Yes DDD we can, and your thirty-two orders are appreciated.

I wonder if people would admit to clicking on them?

For example, I am being honest here...I would guess that you would have clicked.

You obviously can tell whether I clicked, so no mystery there.

If you had to make a list of 5 CGers that clicked, who would be on that list?

[ute4ever]

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

I didnt click on a single one, but I am religious, so of course I wouldn't.

Huh?

[TripletDaddy]

Originally Posted by ute4ever

Huh?

I dont get it?

[ute4ever]

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

Here is an interesting challenge....as mods, can you or mike determine who clicked on any of the porn threads? And how many different times?

If so, I think it would be interesting to make the list public.

I didnt click on a single one, but I am religious, so of course I wouldn't.

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

I wonder if people would admit to clicking on them?

For example, I am being honest here...I would guess that you would have clicked.

You obviously can tell whether I clicked, so no mystery there.

If you had to make a list of 5 CGers that clicked, who would be on that list?

Holmes, this isn't BYU. We don't go around telling on one another here, in hopes of limiting the number of people who are up on our high level.

[PaloAltoCougar]

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

I wonder if people would admit to clicking on them?

For example, I am being honest here...I would guess that you would have clicked.

You obviously can tell whether I clicked, so no mystery there.

If you had to make a list of 5 CGers that clicked, who would be on that list?

I'm clean, but I've always been driven more by fear of discovery than by allegiance to moral principle. I mean, I have some principles, but the threat of being discovered as having visited such sites has always been more compellling deterrent. I've always assumed that everyone looks at my browing history. Clients will be disappointed to see they've occasionally been billed for my constant review of the DDD/SU/MW roundtable.

[il Padrino Ute]

Originally Posted by Archaea

RHG has a great point, why do we still have women's conference and priesthood sessions? At the priesthood sessions, it's a go on a mission and don't look at porn fest, along with, women are better than you. That forms the bulk of all discussions there. Thus with that as a trailer why have it?

I agree she has a great point. But I was in agreement with you about not having the Priesthood session. Especially this week, as the Utes play tomorrow and I won't have an excuse to skip the meeting Saturday.

[RC Vikings]

Originally Posted by RedHeadGal

this response makes me very, very sad. do you also not see the problem with the put-the-woman-on-a-pedestal mindest?

I believe this is done so the women can still take care of the kids and the fewer miles they drive the better are their odds of not crashing the mini van.

[il Padrino Ute]

Originally Posted by RC Vikings

I believe this is done so the women can still take care of the kids and the fewer miles they drive the better are their odds of not crashing the mini van.

LOL!