08-01-2007, 11:02 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Status of Lamanites?
The exchange in the other thread about the arguably misguided good inentions of the Indian Placement Program, and memory of George P. Lee and his image as a Seventy, made me wonder: Is it fair to say the LDS church has for all intents and purposes abandoned the theology that Native Americans are all descendants of Lehi? I'm not being snarky, seriously wondering. It seems to me that if anything part of the apologist strategy is to make greatly less ambitious claims regarding Book of Mormon historicity (FARMS excluded). Do Church leaders ever refer to Native Americans as Lamanites anymore? I bet there's a letter on this somewhere from the First Presidency.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
08-01-2007, 11:08 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
08-01-2007, 11:14 PM | #3 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
The main issue is the introduction of the BoM, where the term "principal ancestors of the American Indian" is used. It certainly isn't emphasized as it may have been in your day. For some reason, that intro was added in 1981. A strange addition where knowledge of genetics should have forewarned them of such a potentially erroneous claim.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα Last edited by Archaea; 08-01-2007 at 11:45 PM. |
|
08-01-2007, 11:17 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I don't think many within the church claims that every Native American is a full-blooded descendant of Lehi. There are just too many years, too much real estate, too many different civilizations, and too many questions left unanswered to make that kind of a blanket statement. That's not to say that Lehi didn't exist, that Laman and Lemuel werent' his sons, or that many Native Americans are descendants of that particular family.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
|
08-01-2007, 11:21 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South Jordan, UT
Posts: 1,799
|
Maybe the reason you don't hear it much anymore is because you don't hear much talk about Native Americans in general anymore.
Since SWK died, interest in Native Americans, at least in the U.S. has died down a bit it seems. He was their great champion. Could be a different story in Central and South America though where NA's are a much bigger % of the population. There may be some truth to your claim though about making LESS ambitious claims. I believe some or many NA's are descended at least partly from Lehi, but given the current DNA evidence (which IMO doesn't prove what its proponents say it proves), it may be wise to soften the claim that Lamanites are the PRINCIPAL ancestors of NA's. Last edited by Venkman; 08-01-2007 at 11:34 PM. |
08-01-2007, 11:38 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Only since 1981? That's interesting. That was apex of the great age of ambitious claims for Book of Mormon historicity.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
08-01-2007, 11:39 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Actualy, since Kimball became the prophet. Many thought his presidency would hail the "Day of the Lamanite" but his emphasis was largely on other things.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
08-01-2007, 11:42 PM | #8 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
His status as Indian Apostle was before my membership. He certainly didn't emphasize that during the portion of his presidency after I joined.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
08-02-2007, 12:18 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Interestingly enough, my Pearl of Great Price teacher told the class that preparations are underway for a new publication of the scriptures. One of the differences that we will see is drastically reduced chapter headings and a reformed footnote system. He specifically cited excessive interpretation as a reason for the change to the chapter headings, though no names were mentioned. Thought that was interesting.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
|
08-02-2007, 12:52 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,059
|
Quote:
If they're making major changes, I wish they'd go to a better Bible translation than the KJV.
__________________
Get your stinking paws off me, you damned, dirty Yewt! "Now perhaps as I spanked myself screaming out "Kozlowski, say it like you mean it bitch!" might have been out of line, but such was the mood." - Goatnapper "If you want to fatten a pig up to make the pig MORE delicious, you can feed it almost anything. Seriously. The pig is like the car on Back to the Future. You put in garbage, and out comes something magical!" - Cali Coug |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|