cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > SPORTS! > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2008, 03:05 AM   #41
il Padrino Ute
Board Pinhead
 
il Padrino Ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
il Padrino Ute is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon View Post
I know, but you suggested that the no-win was because of the arrogance on the part of the favored team. That's not the reason for the no-win -- that's the reason for the upset.
Ok, I'm with you now.

Quote:
The reason it's a no-win lies with the false assumptions upon which the BCS rests.
Agreed.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver

"This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB.
il Padrino Ute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 03:12 AM   #42
UteStar
Senior Member
 
UteStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,817
UteStar is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Utah of 2004, I would have been fine if they were matched up with any of the top teams that year (OK, USC or Auburn)...I am not saying that Utah would have beaten any of them, but it would have been a very entertaining game.

Utah of this year is a good team, top 20 even, maybe top 15. But I do not have much of a desire to play a Texas, Florida or any of them. I would be happy for any BCS game (if they get there) but my nervousness of how the Utes would do would be tenfold playing one of the top 5 teams.

With all that said, the BYU game will be real tough if Johnson has one of his lackluster games.
__________________
UteStar's words to live by: "I'm not about play-play, I'm really about business."

Goatnapper: "UteStar is the only one who is not scum."
UteStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 03:59 AM   #43
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UteStar View Post
Utah of 2004, I would have been fine if they were matched up with any of the top teams that year (OK, USC or Auburn)...I am not saying that Utah would have beaten any of them, but it would have been a very entertaining game.

Utah of this year is a good team, top 20 even, maybe top 15. But I do not have much of a desire to play a Texas, Florida or any of them. I would be happy for any BCS game (if they get there) but my nervousness of how the Utes would do would be tenfold playing one of the top 5 teams.

With all that said, the BYU game will be real tough if Johnson has one of his lackluster games.
I couldn't disagree more. You should always want your team to get into the best bowl possible. Did you know this team is ranked as high as 2004 at a comparable stage in the season? Did 2004 beat any team as good as TCU, OSU or BYU this year? (I'm including BYU because the discussion hypothetically is about whether Utah should want to play as good a team as possible in a bowl game.) Who has Florida beaten of any moment outside of its own crappy conference? Who has USC beaten outside it's own crappy conference except a team from the crappy Big Ten?
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 03:59 AM   #44
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UteStar View Post
Utah of 2004, I would have been fine if they were matched up with any of the top teams that year (OK, USC or Auburn)...I am not saying that Utah would have beaten any of them, but it would have been a very entertaining game.

Utah of this year is a good team, top 20 even, maybe top 15. But I do not have much of a desire to play a Texas, Florida or any of them. I would be happy for any BCS game (if they get there) but my nervousness of how the Utes would do would be tenfold playing one of the top 5 teams.

With all that said, the BYU game will be real tough if Johnson has one of his lackluster games.
That 2004 team was damn good, and I would have liked to watch them against a real team that year.

This year's team may be maximizing its talent most of the time, so the fans should be proud, but it's not on par with the 2004 team. The 2004 team would punish this team for its penchant to commit errors.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 04:06 PM   #45
UteStar
Senior Member
 
UteStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,817
UteStar is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte View Post
I couldn't disagree more. You should always want your team to get into the best bowl possible. Did you know this team is ranked as high as 2004 at a comparable stage in the season? Did 2004 beat any team as good as TCU, OSU or BYU this year? (I'm including BYU because the discussion hypothetically is about whether Utah should want to play as good a team as possible in a bowl game.) Who has Florida beaten of any moment outside of its own crappy conference? Who has USC beaten outside it's own crappy conference except a team from the crappy Big Ten?
I never said that I don't want them to be in the best bowl possible playing the best team possible. I just said that I don't like my chances as much that way and that it makes me a lot more nervous.

And Seattle, you are seriously crazy if you think that this 2008 team is as good as that 2004 team. I like the 2008 team's defense and tenacity...but that 2004 team was one for the ages.
__________________
UteStar's words to live by: "I'm not about play-play, I'm really about business."

Goatnapper: "UteStar is the only one who is not scum."
UteStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 04:14 PM   #46
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UteStar View Post
I never said that I don't want them to be in the best bowl possible playing the best team possible. I just said that I don't like my chances as much that way and that it makes me a lot more nervous.

And Seattle, you are seriously crazy if you think that this 2008 team is as good as that 2004 team. I like the 2008 team's defense and tenacity...but that 2004 team was one for the ages.
That team destroyed teams and was the best team Utah is likely ever to see.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 04:27 PM   #47
ute4ever
I must not tell lies
 
ute4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,103
ute4ever is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Here are two comparisons:

2004 @New Mexico
Utes 28
Lobos 7
(New Mexico finished 7-4)

2008 @New Mexico
Utes 13
Lobos 10
(New Mexico presently 4-7)

---------------------------

2004 vs. Colorado State
Utes 63
CSU 31
(This included leads of 42-3 and 56-10)
(CSU finished 4-7)

2008 vs. Colorado State
Utes 49
CSU 16
(CSU presently 4-6)

-----------------------

If this year's team were to face Pitt in the Orange Bowl, Utah would win by 10 or less.
ute4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 07:17 PM   #48
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
That team destroyed teams and was the best team Utah is likely ever to see.
Archie, I think you meant state of Utah, not U. of Utah, so you may want to file a clarifying post.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 07:25 PM   #49
8ballrollin
Senior Member
 
8ballrollin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 1,287
8ballrollin is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

SI (Mandel) says 'Bama...

Quote:

• The Sugar Bowl will take 12-1 Alabama to replace Florida and, with the second at-large choice, select 12-0 Utah over the Big East champ (which I'm projecting to be 10-3 Cincinnati).

• USC will win out, while Oregon State will stumble once, sending the Trojans to the Rose Bowl where they will meet Big Ten champ Penn State.

• North Carolina will beat Wake Forest in the ACC title game. (To find out how I reached this conclusion, send me a self-addressed stamped envelope and I will send you back a 36-page flow chart in which the league's top six teams all finish either 9-3 or 8-4.)

• Finally, the WAC will free up 12-0 Boise State from its own bowl lineup (just as it did in 2004, when an 11-0 Boise team went to the Liberty Bowl) so that the Broncos can take the Pac-10's vacant spot in the Poinsettia Bowl and face 10-2 BYU.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...x.html?eref=T1
__________________
"Five to one...
One in five
No one here gets out alive"
8ballrollin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 07:35 PM   #50
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8ballrollin View Post
Wow. Should Ute fans be for an OSU stumble to keep USC from taking that Sugar Bowl spot?
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.