cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > SPORTS! > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2010, 03:41 AM   #1
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Washington AD--Pac 10 reaches out to Texas and Texas A&M (Pac 10 + Big 12 merger?)

Quote:
Woodward also talked about expansion and said the Pac-10 and the Big Ten have reached out to officials at Texas and Texas A&M. "I'd be surprised if our office is not in contact with them," he said. "I'm sure those conversations have happened and are taking place."

When asked if the league might expand beyond two teams, Woodward said that's a possibility. "It could be two, four or a merger of Big 12. ... There's a theory that at the end of the day there's only going to be four super conferences. Now that it's going to look like, God only knows."
Of course while it says this has happened, the quotes makes me think that he is merely guessing. Bad writing.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...e_threa_5.html
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 04:34 PM   #2
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Say that Texas, A&M, OU, Colorado, Utah, and Nebraska were invited to join the Pac 10 schools to form the Pac 16.

In the Big 12, that would leave Texas Tech, Ok. St., Baylor, Kansas, Kansas State, Missouri, Iowa State. But let's say Missouri goes to the Big 10.

TT
OSU
Baylor
KU
KSU
ISU

Then from the MWC:
BYU
TCU
UNLV
New Mexico
Air Force
Wyoming
Colorado St.
SDSU

If you kept everyone, that's 14 teams. Kansas obviously very good in basketball. Oklahoma State has a lot of resources and is up-and-coming in football.

These scenarios where BYU is left out--I don't think it is the end of the world. And it's really what we should be prepared for.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 11:25 PM   #3
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

My dark horse for Pac 10 expansion is New Mexico. Nobody is talking about New Mexico, but it has a robust basketball tradtion and respected graduate programs including a medical school. It would help beef up the Pac 10's basketball. New Mexico has cache that even Utah can't claim with Santa Fe, a fairly mild climate, and all, and it is politically and religiously moderate. New Mexico has 27,000 students. If Colorado won't go I think it will be Utah and New Mexico. They would also be natural rivals.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 11:51 PM   #4
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

If New Mexico were taken, it would be on the basis of potential to be good. Because we know that they were mediocre with Rocky Long, which was a huge improvement over what they were before and after Rocky Long. Plus they don't get the support of their town.

Academically NM is a Tier 3 school. It's medical school is not particularly well-regarded. It isn't in the top 100 in research dollars. I've never met anyone who said they wanted to attend or train at New Mexico. I did meet a LDS guy who went to medical school there previously. They are a complete non-factor

If they are taken in expansion it is merely because they are in a relatively large western market (Albqrq) and theoretically have the potential of growing.

Me, I say beware universities that are commuter schools with history of poor support. Both Utah and New Mexico fit this category.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 11:55 PM   #5
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
If New Mexico were taken, it would be on the basis of potential to be good. Because we know that they were mediocre with Rocky Long, which was a huge improvement over what they were before and after Rocky Long. Plus they don't get the support of their town.

Academically NM is a Tier 3 school. It's medical school is not particularly well-regarded. It isn't in the top 100 in research dollars. I've never met anyone who said they wanted to attend or train at New Mexico. I did meet a LDS guy who went to medical school there previously. They are a complete non-factor

If they are taken in expansion it is merely because they are in a relatively large western market (Albqrq) and theoretically have the potential of growing.

Me, I say beware universities that are commuter schools with history of poor support. Both Utah and New Mexico fit this category.
"Commuter school" is a BYU fixation. I never hear it anywhere else. You could call Washington, UCLA, USC, Cal, and Oklahoma "commuter schools."
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 12:00 AM   #6
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte View Post
"Commuter school" is a BYU fixation. I never hear it anywhere else. You could call Washington, UCLA, USC, Cal, and Oklahoma "commuter schools."
Two factors that determine a commuter school:

1. located within a large population
2. easy to be admitted to

Thus leading to lots of local kids enrolling, who live at home the entire time they are attend.

Univ. of Utah fits this to a T.

Cal and UCLA and USC definitely not, because they are not easy to be admitted to. I don't know enough about OU to comment, but it is a school that is known for having subpar academics, and thus I would expect there is easy admittance (and it is in the largest population area in Oklahoma). I don't know enough about Washington to comment. Since they have a much higher standing than Utah, it might be that they are actually difficult to get into.

New Mexico and Utah are not among the elite public universities, and they exist to serve the average college-bound person in their states. Commuter universities.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 12:05 AM   #7
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

If you ever tried googling "commuter school" you wouldn't have to be putting more logs onto your anti-BYU fire.

Here's a kid wondering about U Dub and whether it is a commuter school.

http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/...er-school.html
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 12:21 AM   #8
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Here's another good one.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16889311
From the abstract:
Quote:
The sample of students completing the National College Health Assessment (NCHA) Survey at the University of Utah differs from the national reference group for the NCHA 2003 in age, employment, residence, and marital status. The purpose of this study is to determine if the defining characteristics of a commuter school increase the risk for suicidal thoughts.
From the body of the article:
Quote:
The University of Utah is the flagship 4-year public uni-
versity in the state of Utah. Because of the unique demo-
graphics of the state of Utah, the student population at the
University of Utah differs significantly from student popula-
tions at similar universities in other states. At the University
of Utah,the mean age is 25 years,whereas the average age of
the reference group is 21 years. Nearly 60% of University of
Utah students work more than 20 hours a week, compared
with 23% of the national reference group. Seventy-four per-
cent of University of Utah students live off campus, com-
pared with 43% of students in the national reference group
who live off campus.
Do we still have any doubts about the phrase "commuter school" being used outside of BYU fans, and that Utah is in fact a commuter school?

LOLz. Stupid Utes.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 12:24 AM   #9
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

BYU fans, please feel free to reference my post above. We often have to explain to Univ. of Utah graduates what we mean, and even after we have explained the obvious, they say "sure, but that's not true about the University of Utah."

You can link directly to it with the following URL:

http://cougarguard.com/forum/showpos...89&postcount=8

Please use judiciously. We don't want heads to explode. At least not over our carpet.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 04:19 AM   #10
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
Here's another good one.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16889311
From the abstract:


From the body of the article:


Do we still have any doubts about the phrase "commuter school" being used outside of BYU fans, and that Utah is in fact a commuter school?

LOLz. Stupid Utes.
This is because of all the morons who go on missions instead of doing the rational thing and stay in college for four consecutive years. What is the median age of BYU students?

Utah is top tier on the U.S. News college (undergraduate) rankings even with the legislatively mandated relaxed standards for in-state students. There is not a material difference between Utah and BYU (all the public schools are depressed somewhat by relaxed standards for in-state applicants; still, yes, Washington is very hard to get into). Beyond the undergraduate programs, Utah is THE center of serious research, graduate programs and intellectual activity in a vast six state region (Utah, southern Idaho (I associate norther Idaho with the Northwest), New Mexico, Nevada, Wyoming, and Montana). Utah is better than Oregon by about any measure.

Why do you suppose the Pac 10 won't touch BYU? No fan base? Weak athletic programs? As you well know, the Pac 10 would be embarrassed to be associated with BYU because of its academics life.

Funny. BYU is suppose to be so hard to get into, but there sure seems to be a lot of stupid people who went there.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.