Perhaps the average citizen is too naive

[Archaea]

but what makes the average voter want to entrust the toughest political job to somebody who has never accomplished anything?

If Hillary or Obama are serious candidates, they've never accomplished anything. If you were interviewing for President you would find them unqualified.

Think about it, if you were the IBM board, and looked for somebody to guide your company neither Hillary nor Obama would ever be seriously considered.

Neither has ever managed or accomplished anything, and voters are willing to entrust the most dangerous and difficult job to unqualified bozos?

Even Romney or Giuliani are light in experience but they're loads more qualified and successful than either Democratic front runner.

Name one situation where either has managed a situation where somebody other than their own personal selves have benefitted. You cannot. It's crazy to risk on the job training.