04-15-2008, 07:01 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
How are people defending this???
I've been reading through the posts on Obama's recent comments and I'm amazed at how many are actually buying the line that people are only upset because he's telling the truth. Seriously? Let's examine...
"It's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." So, essentially religion = guns/xenophobia = coping mechanism to deal with frustration. How is that not offensive? How is that the truth? And then there's the word "cling"--each of us "clinging" to our little security blanket of religion because we just have no other way of dealing with life. The very word is offensive. Yeah, this is really poor word choice on his part. But this quote is wrong on so many levels that I can't believe anyone (well, outside of Cali) is willing to defend this. |
04-15-2008, 08:29 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,964
|
He's not equating religion to guns and xenophobia. He's talking about small-minded people who fixate on pet issues. People who vote for candidates based solely on whether they support or oppose abortion, or who care only about where a candidate stands on gun control, or where he/she stands on immigration. Just look at all the dopes who support Huckabee, or those whose opinion of McCain is based solely on his views on immigration. It's understandable why Obama's statements rankled so many, but I think they're pretty much spot on.
__________________
...You've been under attack for days, there's a soldier down, he's wounded, gangrene's setting in, 'Who's used all the penicillin?' 'Oh, Mark Paxson sir, he's got knob rot off of some tart.'" - Gareth Keenan |
04-15-2008, 01:19 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
Quote:
If not, well then I think you're making a very favorable interpretation of what he said, to say the least. To say that people have "pet" issues (likely true in any state of the economy) is very different from "clinging to guns, religion, and antipathy". Supporting immigration reform is very different from "antipathy towards people not like [you]". |
|
04-15-2008, 02:26 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
|
|
04-15-2008, 02:54 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
|
|
04-15-2008, 02:55 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
04-15-2008, 02:56 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
|
|
04-15-2008, 02:58 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
I think I am. His poll numbers went up after the Wright issue, in large part due to his speech (which still registers more hits on Youtube than any of Wrights rants). People recognized it for what it was: a sham attack on a decent man. The entire crux of the Wright issue was whether or not Obama agreed with Wright and was a closet racist. That was pretty easily debunked, so what was left to discuss other than the fact that Wright holds some racist and crazed thoughts?
|
04-15-2008, 03:03 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
Guess what, as I conservative republican I will grant the dems and the press that, you are intellectually superior. It is too bad that intellectual superiority isn't all that important unless you are pontificating or accurately spelling. Give me someone with good common sense anytime. |
|
04-15-2008, 03:12 PM | #10 |
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
|
The veracity of his comment and the intent behind it are irrelevent. It was a dumb thing to say and the Republicans are going to exploit it to portray Obama as an effete elitist. The demographic that would be most offended by this comment could give a shit about nuance. They will give it the worst reading possible and will feel insulted.
This could possibly be Obama's "I voted for the 82 billion before I voted against it." Dems need to get their brilliant orator to stick to script, at least when camera's are around. |
Bookmarks |
|
|