12-18-2008, 06:02 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: DC
Posts: 995
|
on writing
A recent conversation with a colleague went something like this:
Him: "When I edit your work, I'm making it better, not just making stylistic changes." Me: "But I don't agree you are making it better. You fill it with these affectations I would never write. You do things like bury the subjects of sentences behind long introductory phrases." Him: "You may be talking about good writing in other fields. This is legal writing." Is this just a generational problem? In my mind, good writing transcends the professional field. Why do some professions or genres of writing become so firmly entrenched in certain styles and affectations that people who have been using them for years become convinced that their writing is "good" just because the rhetorical style matches the rhetorical style that has been used before? |
12-18-2008, 06:08 PM | #2 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
12-18-2008, 06:09 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Central God's Country
Posts: 1,534
|
Quote:
__________________
I see a hobo. And when I see the hobo, I think to myself, "This man is poor. His monetary value is low, and my monetary value is high, and it's a shame that he is himself. What can I do?" Last edited by landpoke; 12-18-2008 at 06:46 PM. Reason: No point in beating around the bush. |
|
12-18-2008, 06:25 PM | #4 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
I am quite secure but believe I undercharge.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
12-18-2008, 06:40 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Central God's Country
Posts: 1,534
|
By using "most" instead of "all" I believe I accounted for you.
__________________
I see a hobo. And when I see the hobo, I think to myself, "This man is poor. His monetary value is low, and my monetary value is high, and it's a shame that he is himself. What can I do?" |
12-18-2008, 06:42 PM | #6 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
I know but I wanted everybody else do know which one you accounted for.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
12-18-2008, 06:47 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Central God's Country
Posts: 1,534
|
I edited my original post. You are, of course, correct and there's no point in beating around the bush simply to spare some other lawyer's feelings.
__________________
I see a hobo. And when I see the hobo, I think to myself, "This man is poor. His monetary value is low, and my monetary value is high, and it's a shame that he is himself. What can I do?" |
12-18-2008, 09:02 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
Editing is a rare talent. A good editor won't infuse personal preferences into the writer's work. Nor will he make stylistic changes. A good editor should be reading for mechanics, coherence, and continuity.
So to answer your question: No, I don't think this is a generational difference in identifying good writing. I think this guy simply has a fundamental misunderstanding of what proofreading is. |
12-18-2008, 09:24 PM | #9 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
I think I can relate to how MacArthur must have felt as he got the first reports that his entire Air Force had been destroyed by the Japanese surprise attack, and that retreat and defeat was essentially unescapable.
This was after reading the first chapter of SU's book and thinking about his editor. Thhuuubbbbbbtttttt!!!!!!! |
12-19-2008, 05:20 AM | #10 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|