04-02-2009, 02:28 AM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
Good thing Kimball finally listened to his close relative. I wonder if she got credit in the footnotes.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
04-02-2009, 02:50 AM | #32 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
Polygamy (from eternal, celestial law to abomination resulting in excommunication -- talk about a 180 degree shift!) Temple ceremony (no more violent penalties) Word of Wisdom (from simple non-compulsory advice to one of the most basic standards of worthiness) Interracial marriage was bad (now it's not) Women couldn't pray in Sacrament Meeting (now they can) Women couldn't speak in General Conference (now they can) I could go on. There were members of the Church who didn't like these things and eventually things changed for the better. Who was right? Who was wrong? |
|
04-02-2009, 03:27 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
I guess the possibility of "neither" has never occurred to you.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
04-02-2009, 03:56 AM | #34 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 471
|
Seems a bit relativistic of you to consider that possibility.
Don't those who think they know better than Church leaders represent the tares who need to be sifted from the wheat? That was Indy's point and I think it's a ridiculous argument for anybody with an appreciation for how the Church has evolved over its history. |
04-02-2009, 04:05 AM | #35 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Newsflash: the church just evolved on their position on the sale of alcohol in Utah.
|
04-02-2009, 04:26 AM | #36 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
I have learned there is a small subset of Mormons who essentially believe as I do but like to torment themselves with continued activity.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
04-02-2009, 04:52 AM | #37 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
One of my wife's friends came to visit us recently. She goes to some type of generic Christian church in Tennessee. She said about half the congregation has stopped coming to church recently because they didn't like the way the church leadership was letting a gay guy participate in services (things like passing out the communion). I don't think participating in LDS (or any church) services is right or beneficial for everyone. But when I weigh the pluses and minuses for me personally, I still think it's right for me. If I stopped going to church, I wouldn't spend that time doing anything better. The people I find inscrutable are those who claim to believe wholeheartedly but at the same time slack off when it comes to Church duties and commandments. They seem like the most irrational subset of Mormons to me. |
|
04-02-2009, 04:58 AM | #38 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
They are probably more thoughtess than irrational. Unexamined lives. They don't participate becuase it's not fulfiling and they don't examine why it's not fulfilling.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
04-02-2009, 05:00 AM | #39 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
|
04-02-2009, 05:00 AM | #40 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 471
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|