Recording of an excommunication

[Flystripper]

Originally Posted by Taq Man

If the church is on the up and up with nothing to hide then what are you worried about? I thought everyone involved in the hearing played well their part.

In other words much ado about nothing. I can see throwing him under the bus as a self important attention grabber. His look at me workshops that took place after words are a bit self serving and I think he comes off as a douche bag, but recording and publishing the hearing I don't have a problem with. The church keeps a record, so should the member.

I do not have a problem with the recording. The only problem I have with the publishing of it is that IMHO he comes off as a douche bag and I don't particularly like douche bags.

[Taq Man]

Originally Posted by myboynoah

You seem hesitant to answer the question. Why?

I thought I stated in my first post of the thread that I had no problem with it. So let me say for the record, no it does not bother me. Potential was there for mistreatment. Were I in his shoes I would want my own record of the hearing as well.

His publishing it makes him a bit of an ass hole but I really don't care about it either. The church has nothing to fear from disclosing the minutes of these hearings if the ex-ed people agree to the release.

Nothing good comes from keeping this hush hush.

[myboynoah]

Originally Posted by Taq Man

I thought I stated in my first post of the thread that I had no problem with it. So let me say for the record, no it does not bother me. Potential was there for mistreatment. Were I in his shoes I would want my own record of the hearing as well.

His publishing it makes him a bit of an ass hole but I really don't care about it either. The church has nothing to fear from disclosing the minutes of these hearings if the ex-ed people agree to the release.

Nothing good comes from keeping this hush hush.

So you have no problem with someone recording you without your knowledge and then publishing it?

[T Blue]

Originally Posted by myboynoah

So you have no problem with someone recording you without your knowledge and then publishing it?

The guy should have just been on the up and up and just whipped the recorder out when the meeting started, then there would have been ZERO question as to what his motives were.

[Indy Coug]

The SUPREME IRONY was his pontificating about how only corrupt organizations hide or control information, yet he clandestinely recorded the proceedings.

[Flystripper]

Originally Posted by Indy Coug

The SUPREME IRONY was his pontificating about how only corrupt organizations hide or control information, yet he clandestinely recorded the proceedings.

I did catch that and it did make me smile.

[Taq Man]

Originally Posted by myboynoah

So you have no problem with someone recording you without your knowledge and then publishing it?

No I am honest in my dealings with my fellow men.

[SeattleUte]

This thread, only a few hours old, is already a spectacular bestseller. I bet in terms of hits and posts it will be the biggest seller ever.

[BYU71]

Originally Posted by SeattleUte

This thread, only a few hours old, is already a spectacular bestseller. I bet in terms of hits and posts it will be the biggest seller ever.

Yea, I couldn't put it down. I forgot to execute a trade properly today. You will probably read about it in the near future since the market was down $300 today they will want to blame someone.

[T Blue]

Originally Posted by BYU71

Yea, I couldn't put it down. I forgot to execute a trade properly today. You will probably read about it in the near future since the market was down $300 today they will want to blame someone.

Sell, Sell, dammit!!!