cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > SPORTS! > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2009, 05:51 PM   #11
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueK View Post
That is a very good question.

Here are some teams that won first round games last year:

Western Ky
Siena
Cleveland State
Dayton

There were many others that were seeded lower than us who gave their high seeded opponent a much better game than we did to A&M, including USU's near upset of Marquette.

You can try to overanalyze the reasons all you want, but dumb luck is as much of a reason as anything else. None of those teams that I listed above are teams you or I would fear in the regular season.

And even though we haven't won recently, except for last year, BYU actually has played pretty well in their previous recent appearances. Xavier was a darn good team that should have beaten #1 seed Ohio State after they slipped by us. Only a terrible call by the officials in the closing seconds prevented that.

I don't care what Mike says, the streak can't last forever. We have had some teams that were talented enough to win a game. We just haven't had the breaks.
Shawn Bradley's win was a long time ago. Or did we defeat SMU without him.

Winning in the Tourney is fun, and I really have no fun, except to see the little puppies whip a big dog now and then, if other teams win. Okay I lied, I had a smidgeon of fun when Utah did well, but that feels like a long time ago as well.

The bad part of being a fan of BYU or another less successful school, is you often need to have great memories, because unlike being a fan of Kentucky or North Carolina, you don't have to remember very long before another Tourney run comes along. Yet, becoming a fan of a school with which one has no affiliation is not an option.

If Miles can make some improvement at the line, rebound say, 6 to 7 times per game and Tav has improved based on his Brazil team experience, a country which should be cursed for its lack of observance of the rule of law, then this year might be rewarding.

I don't expect too many losses, save perhaps to Arizona, one to UNLV, Utah and probably one to SDSU, and the probably the first round Tourney loss.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

Last edited by Archaea; 10-09-2009 at 05:54 PM.
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 06:04 PM   #12
BlueK
Senior Member
 
BlueK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,368
BlueK is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Shawn Bradley's win was a long time ago. Or did we defeat SMU without him.

Winning in the Tourney is fun, and I really have no fun, except to see the little puppies whip a big dog now and then, if other teams win. Okay I lied, I had a smidgeon of fun when Utah did well, but that feels like a long time ago as well.

The bad part of being a fan of BYU or another less successful school, is you often need to have great memories, because unlike being a fan of Kentucky or North Carolina, you don't have to remember very long before another Tourney run comes along. Yet, becoming a fan of a school with which one has no affiliation is not an option.

If Miles can make some improvement at the line, rebound say, 6 to 7 times per game and Tav has improved based on his Brazil team experience, a country which should be cursed for its lack of observance of the rule of law, then this year might be rewarding.

I don't expect too many losses, save perhaps to Arizona, one to UNLV, Utah and probably one to SDSU, and the probably the first round Tourney loss.
The SMU win was in 93 while Bradley was still on his mission. The losing streak bothers me as much as it could any follower of BYU basketball. It's very frustrating. However, if we only lose the games you've indicated, we will get a high enough seeding that we should win in the first round. I've consistently argued that BYU's NCAA tournament problems are a result of failures in the regular season and weak scheduling. We never seem to do enough to warrant much better treatment than the committee gives us, so we keep getting slapped with seedings even the great program to the north of us couldn't win. In fact, Utah has very seldom won an NCAA game when they've been seeded in the bottom half of the bracket. If we can ever get to the top half we'll probably win.
__________________
I am a libertarian
BlueK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 06:29 PM   #13
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueK View Post
The SMU win was in 93 while Bradley was still on his mission. The losing streak bothers me as much as it could any follower of BYU basketball. It's very frustrating. However, if we only lose the games you've indicated, we will get a high enough seeding that we should win in the first round. I've consistently argued that BYU's NCAA tournament problems are a result of failures in the regular season and weak scheduling. We never seem to do enough to warrant much better treatment than the committee gives us, so we keep getting slapped with seedings even the great program to the north of us couldn't win. In fact, Utah has very seldom won an NCAA game when they've been seeded in the bottom half of the bracket. If we can ever get to the top half we'll probably win.
To me, it seems BYU's receiving an upper end bracket seeding depends upon very few losses and a win against Arizona, no home losses and no more than three conference losses. Given the lack of depth in the front line, that might be a tall order.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 06:44 PM   #14
BlueK
Senior Member
 
BlueK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,368
BlueK is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
To me, it seems BYU's receiving an upper end bracket seeding depends upon very few losses and a win against Arizona, no home losses and no more than three conference losses. Given the lack of depth in the front line, that might be a tall order.
13-3 in conference is doable and we can go undefeated at home. A win over ASU is necessary. A win over Arizona might be a longshot but I don't think it's impossible. If all we have is 4-5 losses I think a 5-7 seed is realistic.
__________________
I am a libertarian
BlueK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 06:59 PM   #15
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueK View Post
13-3 in conference is doable and we can go undefeated at home. A win over ASU is necessary. A win over Arizona might be a longshot but I don't think it's impossible. If all we have is 4-5 losses I think a 5-7 seed is realistic.
I concur with your assessment. Of course, a key injury and all our speculation is for naught. Loss at Utah, UNLV and SDSU. Wild card might be how UNM progresses. They could also add an another away loss.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

Last edited by Archaea; 10-09-2009 at 07:04 PM.
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.