One of the downsides of not being - cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board

BYU71 · 06-21-2007, 03:04 PM

able to post on CB is not being able to respond to some pretty stupid statements. By the way, we all make them and I enjoy posts pointing out mine.

Anyway back to the subject at hand. An interesting discussion going on about swim suits and perhaps some people in the church get carried away.

You can always count on some Mullah coming along to defend a muslim type position on the subject.

http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2777556

Archaea · 06-21-2007, 03:07 PM

Here is a good comment on the subject.

http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2777506

FarrahWaters · 06-21-2007, 03:40 PM

The link takes me to a blank post. Has it been deleted, or do I need to be signed in to read it?

Regarding one-piece swimsuits, when we were dating, Mike tells me that he was afforded a full view of my derriere as I climbed out of a pool in my one-piece that was riding up. (I guess I passed the inspection?)

MikeWaters · 06-21-2007, 03:42 PM

There were two dates that solidified my decision in sticking with the relationship:

Playing pool (loose shirt)

Hottub (illfitting swimsuit)

BYU71 · 06-21-2007, 03:43 PM

That sounds very plausible. My ex-wife was a song leader at USU and I will say her sweet spirit isn't what attracted me to her.

However, the bigger question for all of us would be, what attracted you to Mike???

Archaea · 06-21-2007, 03:44 PM

My views, in light of my heritage and coming from Nevada, are much more liberal than most, in terms of clothing modesty.

The Church policy is best, and that is where I should stay. However, I admit to being curious a bit, why, other than garment reasons, why adults believe shoulders and backs exposed are inherently immodest. I for one don't get all hot and bothered seeing a shoulder or back.

Perhaps it comes from an appreciation of classical sculpture, but as SEIQ's post about erotica, pornea and just plain art, not all nudity is erotic, or intended to be. The human form is beautiful and we LDS seem ashamed of our form.

ewth8tr · 06-21-2007, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FarrahWaters

The link takes me to a blank post. Has it been deleted, or do I need to be signed in to read it?

Regarding one-piece swimsuits, when we were dating, Mike tells me that he was afforded a full view of my derriere as I climbed out of a pool in my one-piece that was riding up. (I guess I passed the inspection?)

it's a religious post, so you have to be logged in and a donor to read it.

MikeWaters · 06-21-2007, 03:47 PM

Farrah, your account name is "SilverBeaver" (cougarboard).

FMCoug · 06-21-2007, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeWaters

Farrah, your account name is "SilverBeaver" (cougarboard).

You better post the password too in case she doesn't remember.

BYU71 · 06-21-2007, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeWaters

Farrah, your account name is "SilverBeaver" (cougarboard).

Great scouting term. I suggested my last girlfriend use it for her password.

06-21-2007, 03:04 PM	#1
BYU71 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 5,084	One of the downsides of not being able to post on CB is not being able to respond to some pretty stupid statements. By the way, we all make them and I enjoy posts pointing out mine. Anyway back to the subject at hand. An interesting discussion going on about swim suits and perhaps some people in the church get carried away. You can always count on some Mullah coming along to defend a muslim type position on the subject. http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2777556

06-21-2007, 03:07 PM	#2
Archaea Assistant to the Regional Manager Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: The Orgasmatron Posts: 24,338	Here is a good comment on the subject. http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2777506 __________________ Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

06-21-2007, 03:44 PM	#6
Archaea Assistant to the Regional Manager Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: The Orgasmatron Posts: 24,338	My views, in light of my heritage and coming from Nevada, are much more liberal than most, in terms of clothing modesty. The Church policy is best, and that is where I should stay. However, I admit to being curious a bit, why, other than garment reasons, why adults believe shoulders and backs exposed are inherently immodest. I for one don't get all hot and bothered seeing a shoulder or back. Perhaps it comes from an appreciation of classical sculpture, but as SEIQ's post about erotica, pornea and just plain art, not all nudity is erotic, or intended to be. The human form is beautiful and we LDS seem ashamed of our form. __________________ Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

06-21-2007, 03:40 PM	#3
FarrahWaters Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 1,122	The link takes me to a blank post. Has it been deleted, or do I need to be signed in to read it? Regarding one-piece swimsuits, when we were dating, Mike tells me that he was afforded a full view of my derriere as I climbed out of a pool in my one-piece that was riding up. (I guess I passed the inspection?)

06-21-2007, 03:42 PM	#4
MikeWaters Demiurge Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 36,365	There were two dates that solidified my decision in sticking with the relationship: Playing pool (loose shirt) Hottub (illfitting swimsuit)

06-21-2007, 03:43 PM	#5
BYU71 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 5,084	That sounds very plausible. My ex-wife was a song leader at USU and I will say her sweet spirit isn't what attracted me to her. However, the bigger question for all of us would be, what attracted you to Mike???

06-21-2007, 03:47 PM	#8
MikeWaters Demiurge Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 36,365	Farrah, your account name is "SilverBeaver" (cougarboard).