Way to represent, GOP!!!

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

Only brain dead attorneys? Your quote came BEFORE you even provided a survey.

Here is a quick summary for your review:

Tex makes broad, absurd claim.
Cali asks for proof.
Tex provides a cite, then says it proves what he claims.
Cali points out the citation supports a proposition much narrower than what Tex claims.
Tex then argues that what he meant to say (and what any smart person would think he meant to say) is exactly what the citation says.

Hard to ever be wrong if your claims constantly evolve to mean exactly whatever any evidence you can provide says, even if the evidence you provide doesn't actually support your original claim.

Let me try one:

All internet links go to cougarguard.com.

http://cougarguard.com

Click on the link above for proof.

See- all internet links go to cougarguard.com (and if you can't understand that I mean that only the link above goes to cougarguard.com, then you are braindead).

And your explanation about my analogy is what is poor here (and all you really do is reference someone else's explanation, though oddly not Indy Coug's).

Sigh. I suppose all Cali Coug are destined to wallow in technicalities. All you've done is taken a single sentence from a single post, applied some of your lame lawyer language-parsing to it, and blown it way out of proportion. My point stands; I think the horse is long dead.

The NAACP is not going to get serious GOP attention while it's making James Byrd videos, simple as that. It is my opinion therefore, that blacks are going to have to change their attitude about Republicans far more than the reverse. Those empty podiums are more an indictment of their partisan politics than vice versa.

[Archaea]

You two have a helluva lot of endurance.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

Ah, so now it is a technicality. A minute ago, I was a brain-dead California lawyer for not getting it.

It is a technicality. And you are a brain-dead lawyer for not getting it.

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

And you are now arguing that blacks (the constituencies) must react more to the political party than the political party must react to the constituency. Earlier, you argued that only political parties respond to constituencies, and not the other way around.

You're twisting my words again. Ultimately political parties respond to constituencies, is what I said. Thus, if the NAACP wants the GOP to pay attention them, they're going to have at least pretend to be less partisan.

This isn't complicated stuff.

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

Keeping track of your arguments is like trying to keep track of a certain ant in an ant farm.

It's more like watching you play Twister with yourself. Instead of taking the easy route to the red dot, you wrap your arm around your leg a few times, and then get mad at me for your pretzeled body.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Archaea

You two have a helluva lot of endurance.

Correcting the record when arguing with two liars is a full time job. I may need to hire an intern.

[Tex]

Cali Coug's monolith Mormons.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19762071/site/newsweek/

[FMCoug]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

The NAACP represents a group of people defined by skin color, not by ideology.

Yeah and the ACLU is all about defending Civil Liberties of ALL Americans. Sorry but the names of both of those organizations are complete bullshit. When Colin Powell, Condi Rice, Bill Cosby, etc. are treated as the "enemy" by the organization, it's about ideology, not skin color.

[il Padrino Ute]

Originally Posted by FMCoug

Yeah and the ACLU is all about defending Civil Liberties of ALL Americans. Sorry but the names of both of those organizations are complete bullshit. When Colin Powell, Condi Rice, Bill Cospy, etc. are treated as the "enemy" by the organization, it's about ideology, not skin color.

Thank you.