09-29-2008, 04:29 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
Quote:
RPI is a terrible way to rate teams--both BB and FB. I have an RPI query, and my results go. 1. Boise St 2. Va Tech 3. Utah 4. OK 5. Georgia But I may still be using the old RPI formula in my football database. |
|
09-29-2008, 04:29 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
There's also a poll that has Utah at #1. There are problems with every computer methodology in there, especially this early in the season, which is why I think the aggregate of a whole lot of them is more interesting than any single poll alone.
|
09-29-2008, 04:30 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
I agree with this. And I would put a computer poll average against any other ranking system, with the possible exception of Vegas oddsmakers.
|
09-29-2008, 04:37 PM | #14 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
|
09-29-2008, 04:41 PM | #15 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
Except in parody. The problem was everyone including Il Padrino was annointing BYU the next NC based on a shutout of Wyoming. (One thing BM does do well is RUTS against hideous opponents.) These polls are more meaningful than all the exuberance we've seen here the past few days. Just a little reminder of reality.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
09-29-2008, 04:43 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
Quote:
It's not fair when doing rankings that affect post season honors to program into a computer to ignore games where a player was hurt, or to factor in a midseason personnel change, or keep a preseason bias factor, etc. |
|
09-29-2008, 04:45 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
|
09-29-2008, 04:45 PM | #18 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Quote:
It's based on what they know of the teams, and the expectations and psychology. |
|
09-29-2008, 04:46 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
Quote:
Max has played a total of 5 quarters in the last two games. What, pray tell, should Bronco have done against either of the "hideous opponents" we shut out? Taken Hall out at the half? The first quarter? Maybe not played him at all? Maybe we should've played ten guys (that's one less than you're allowed, by the way)? |
|
09-29-2008, 04:46 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|