cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-25-2008, 03:31 PM   #151
TripletDaddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
TripletDaddy can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mormon Red Death View Post
dont you think there is a little difference in being asked by JC to follow him then being compelled to pay taxes?
Not really. He was asking them to give up their sources of income. He asked the same of the rich young prince. I think it was very deliberate that he asked the prince to give it all up. He could have very easily said, "Hey, keep all your stuff because it may come in handy for us in the future as we try to spread the Gospel." Today, we aren't asked to give up all our possessions, but if paying an extra little bit will really help, then I am willing to listen.

I am not even sure socialized medicine is the answer. I have stated previously that any socialized proposal would never be ratified anyway, so why is everone worried about it? But even if it were, there would be no law prohibiting the private practice of medicine (status quo). These arguments about concern over diminished quality of healthcare are really thinly veiled admissions of selfishness.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

"Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte
TripletDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 03:32 PM   #152
TripletDaddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
TripletDaddy can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
It would require very sophisticated economic analysis with so many unverifiable variables, that the numbers wouldn't be reliable.

Go back and research what government predicted Social Security and Medicare would cost from 1964 to 1984. You'll find, IIRC, and I don't always, that the rosy prediction of the sixties was off about 10 to 20 fold or greater. Given that knowledge using that rubric may be a good benchmark. Multiply whatever the government predicts by ten or twenty times, and you'll have what it will actually cost.
If Obama passes his health care bill, there will be a tax imposed. This tax increase has to be outlined somewhere because the bill will not pass without a specific budget. I dont know whether the numbers will be reliable. I want to know what the proposed number is that all of you are crowing about. If you dont even know how much it is, then what are you all complaining about? What if it is $65 a year?
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

"Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte
TripletDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 03:38 PM   #153
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TripletDaddy View Post
If Obama passes his health care bill, there will be a tax imposed. This tax increase has to be outlined somewhere because the bill will not pass without a specific budget. I dont know whether the numbers will be reliable. I want to know what the proposed number is that all of you are crowing about. If you dont even know how much it is, then what are you all complaining about? What if it is $65 a year?
Now I remember. The original prediction for Medicare was 4 billion per year, it was off. At the time the actual was 400 billion.

I don't care what his prediction would be.

If it's 65 dollars, then you should predict a real cost of 6500. Would you be willing to pay an extra 6500. BTW, based on the WSJ or some other economist, I did the calc and mine was much worse than 6500 dollars. So no, Obama can go screw himself.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 04:08 PM   #154
TripletDaddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
TripletDaddy can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Now I remember. The original prediction for Medicare was 4 billion per year, it was off. At the time the actual was 400 billion.

I don't care what his prediction would be.

If it's 65 dollars, then you should predict a real cost of 6500. Would you be willing to pay an extra 6500. BTW, based on the WSJ or some other economist, I did the calc and mine was much worse than 6500 dollars. So no, Obama can go screw himself.
"It would require a very sophisticated economic analysis......oh, wait, now I remember, I did my OWN calc at home on my PC....."

Listen to what you are saying. Do you really think such a bill would pass? I think it would be as successful as, say.....Hillary's attempt.

"Guess what, America, as your newly elected president, I am imposing a new tax per household of $6500 a year!"
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

"Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte
TripletDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 04:58 PM   #155
Mormon Red Death
Senior Member
 
Mormon Red Death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
Mormon Red Death is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TripletDaddy View Post
Not really. He was asking them to give up their sources of income. He asked the same of the rich young prince. I think it was very deliberate that he asked the prince to give it all up. He could have very easily said, "Hey, keep all your stuff because it may come in handy for us in the future as we try to spread the Gospel." Today, we aren't asked to give up all our possessions, but if paying an extra little bit will really help, then I am willing to listen.

I am not even sure socialized medicine is the answer. I have stated previously that any socialized proposal would never be ratified anyway, so why is everone worried about it? But even if it were, there would be no law prohibiting the private practice of medicine (status quo). These arguments about concern over diminished quality of healthcare are really thinly veiled admissions of selfishness.
I've covenated to give up everything to church if asked.
__________________
Its all about the suit
Mormon Red Death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 05:04 PM   #156
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TripletDaddy View Post
"It would require a very sophisticated economic analysis......oh, wait, now I remember, I did my OWN calc at home on my PC....."

Listen to what you are saying. Do you really think such a bill would pass? I think it would be as successful as, say.....Hillary's attempt.

"Guess what, America, as your newly elected president, I am imposing a new tax per household of $6500 a year!"
No, but I bet a bill that states, you guys will only be taxed $65. And then when the bill comes, "oops, we're sorry, but you have 'free' health care." That's what I fear. A lie to get us into the predicament and once we're f..ed, no way to get out.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 05:08 PM   #157
Mormon Red Death
Senior Member
 
Mormon Red Death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
Mormon Red Death is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TripletDaddy View Post
If Obama passes his health care bill, there will be a tax imposed. This tax increase has to be outlined somewhere because the bill will not pass without a specific budget. I dont know whether the numbers will be reliable. I want to know what the proposed number is that all of you are crowing about. If you dont even know how much it is, then what are you all complaining about? What if it is $65 a year?
Look at Ontario Canada versus Michigan

A single man in canada making 50k a year pays 26% federal Income tax plus 9.15% provincial tax

He also pays and average of 18% sales tax

that same single man in Michigan pays 25% federal income tax and 4% state tax. He also pay 6% sales tax

They both have about the same Social Security Tax
__________________
Its all about the suit
Mormon Red Death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 05:13 PM   #158
tooblue
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,016
tooblue is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mormon Red Death View Post
Look at Ontario Canada versus Michigan

A single man in canada making 50k a year pays 26% federal Income tax plus 9.15% provincial tax

He also pays and average of 18% sales tax

that same single man in Michigan pays 25% federal income tax and 4% state tax. He also pay 6% sales tax

They both have about the same Social Security Tax
He doesn't pay 18% sales tax anymore -it's been reduced by the conservative government!!
tooblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.