cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-21-2008, 03:16 PM   #41
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
Heh, right. You don't believe that.
Is he or is he not "guaranteed" the nomination right now?
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 03:34 PM   #42
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
Is he or is he not "guaranteed" the nomination right now?
Oh stop playing your little word games. You know his status as well as I do.

But if you think those percentages would've changed much had he "officially" done it by the WV primary, you're smoking something.

Just applying your flawed logic elsewhere.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 03:43 PM   #43
exUte
Senior Member
 
exUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
exUte can only hope to improve
Default Compared to Hillary and Barack's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
The media is so enjoying the prolonged Dem race that they haven't stopped to notice that McCain only received 73% of the vote in the Republican primary. 27% of Pennsylvanians (over 200,000 voters) went to the polls just to vote AGAINST the guy who was guaranteed to win the nomination.

Republicans are going to be sorely disappointed in November. Particularly those like Myboynoah who think the Dems are throwing this thing away.
backers who say they won't vote for the other candidate? I'll take McCain's troubles over the Dems.
exUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 03:59 PM   #44
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by exUte View Post
backers who say they won't vote for the other candidate? I'll take McCain's troubles over the Dems.
Heh, that's an even better point. Here's a few fun facts out of Kentucky for our not-so-guaranteed Obama:

If these are the only candidates on the ballot in November, for whom would you vote?
Obama: 50%
McCain: 32%
Stay home: 15%

No matter how you voted today, would you be satisfied with Obama:
Satisfied: 43%
Dissatisfied: 55%

No matter how you voted today, would you be:
Satisfied only if Hillary Clinton is the nominee: 48%
Satisfied only if Barack Obama is the nominee: 14%
Satisfied if either one is the nominee: 28%

LOL.

MSNBC exit polling
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225982/
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young

Last edited by Tex; 05-21-2008 at 04:15 PM.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 03:53 PM   #45
exUte
Senior Member
 
exUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
exUte can only hope to improve
Default Compared to this?

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05...nder-in-chief/

Even the Demo strategist thinks his comments were nonsense and not very helpful. Looks like the Dem are in self-destructive mode again.
exUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 08:19 PM   #46
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
Oh stop playing your little word games. You know his status as well as I do.

But if you think those percentages would've changed much had he "officially" done it by the WV primary, you're smoking something.

Just applying your flawed logic elsewhere.
Ah, so you are trying to compare Pennsylvania (which is and has been polling closer for Republicans and may be a swing state) to West Virginia (which isn't and won't be a Democratic state)? While it would be lovely for the Dems to take WV, they won't, so Obama's struggles there don't mean that much. McCain's struggles in PA mean much more, given that he needs PA. And it is a bad comparison because Obama isn't guaranteed the nomination (despite what you want to claim).

In other words, you are simply awful at comparative analysis.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 08:20 PM   #47
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
Heh, that's an even better point. Here's a few fun facts out of Kentucky for our not-so-guaranteed Obama:

If these are the only candidates on the ballot in November, for whom would you vote?
Obama: 50%
McCain: 32%
Stay home: 15%

No matter how you voted today, would you be satisfied with Obama:
Satisfied: 43%
Dissatisfied: 55%

No matter how you voted today, would you be:
Satisfied only if Hillary Clinton is the nominee: 48%
Satisfied only if Barack Obama is the nominee: 14%
Satisfied if either one is the nominee: 28%

LOL.

MSNBC exit polling
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225982/
Wow- getting your talking points from exUte. Good luck with that one.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 02:52 PM   #48
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
Ah, so you are trying to compare Pennsylvania (which is and has been polling closer for Republicans and may be a swing state) to West Virginia (which isn't and won't be a Democratic state)? While it would be lovely for the Dems to take WV, they won't, so Obama's struggles there don't mean that much. McCain's struggles in PA mean much more, given that he needs PA. And it is a bad comparison because Obama isn't guaranteed the nomination (despite what you want to claim).

In other words, you are simply awful at comparative analysis.
Pennsylvania hasn't voted Republican in 20 years. WV is as good an example as any to show how ridiculous your initial post in this thread was.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.