A fundamentalist revision of inerrancy

[Archaea]

Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon

What did you think of his argument regarding OT inerrancy? I found it much weaker than his NT argument.

I noticed the article was a little dated. I found one from this year which touches on many of the same points, but unfortunately does not address OT at all.

I found the whole argument laughable, but to say, "we know the true words through textual criticism," is a claim not even Bart D. Ehrman would make.

[BarbaraGordon]

Originally Posted by Archaea

but to say, "we know the true words through textual criticism," is a claim not even Bart D. Ehrman would make.

Well, Ehrman is an actual scholar and this guy is just a youth minister. And the two men have very different aims.

I can see this young man convincing himself with his NT reasoning. But I have a hard time believing that even he believes his OT argument.