Nichols & Mcveigh and 'enhanced interrogation'

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

So then you agree that torture is not permitted of any human being, whether they are American or not (given that you appear to have just attempted to explain the differences between how McVeigh should have been treated v. al-Qaeda and never mentioned torture).

All I'm really trying to say is that citizen-terrorists have more rights under the Constitution than foreign terrorists.

I know you're twisting yourself into a pretzel desperately trying to find a way to disagree with that.

[Cali Coug]

Originally Posted by Tex

All I'm really trying to say is that citizen-terrorists have more rights under the Constitution than foreign terrorists.

I know you're twisting yourself into a pretzel desperately trying to find a way to disagree with that.

Wow- way to contribute to the thread on torture with that gem.

My equally significant contribution would read: "I like catsup on hotdogs."

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

Wow- way to contribute to the thread on torture with that gem.

My equally significant contribution would read: "I like catsup on hotdogs."

Translation: "Having failed to find a way to disagree, I'll cover up my inadequacy by just mocking you and hope no one notices."

[Cali Coug]

Originally Posted by Tex

Translation: "Having failed to find a way to disagree, I'll cover up my inadequacy by just mocking you and hope no one notices."

No, Tex, I am simply calling you on your backtracking and enjoying the ride.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

No, Tex, I am simply calling you on your backtracking and enjoying the ride.

No backtracking here. Not my fault you choose not to read.

[Cali Coug]

Originally Posted by Tex

No backtracking here. Not my fault you choose not to read.

Yeah, that must be it.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

Yeah, that must be it.

As I said, it's fun to have you back. I've missed having someone distort my words to say something I didn't mean, and then mock me for backtracking when I clarify.

It follows your standard pattern:

http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2629040

[Cali Coug]

Originally Posted by Tex

As I said, it's fun to have you back. I've missed having someone distort my words to say something I didn't mean, and then mock me for backtracking when I clarify.

It follows your standard pattern:

http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2629040

Wow- you are right. I didn't think you were, but now that you have linked to a real authority figure on the matter (yourself), who could disagree?

I should do the same.

Tex is always wrong. See below for an authority on the subject.

http://cougarguard.com/forum/showpos...1&postcount=59

Way to pull yet another Tex.

By the way, I haven't figured out what there was to distort yet. Apparently, your post had nothing to do with the topic at hand, and any further attempts at clarification of what you meant are referred to Indy's posts on the topic.

[Cali Coug]

Tex is always wrong.

[Tex]

Why don't you just print out my Sig and tape it to your computer screen. You'll feel much better.