cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > SPORTS! > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2007, 05:26 PM   #21
RockyBalboa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 7,297
RockyBalboa is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to RockyBalboa
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
I am just wondering when the sexual tension between these two is going to boil over.
lol...paging Taqman.
__________________
Masquerading as Cougarguards very own genius dumbass since 05'.
RockyBalboa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 05:30 PM   #22
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockyBalboa View Post
Actually I know what you're arguing. You've been arguing all along that Utah's Rush D is medicore and I disagree. I thnk they are terrible.

So let's see if I get this quote accurately "I would say that if you are holding a team under their season average in rushing, that you actually don't have a terrible rush defense." ---- I just want to make sure that's your exact quote...because that will be used in the future to mock like you've so richly earned to be.

So you're telling me if Utah holds Navy to 250 yards (under their average)rushing that means you're rushing defense isn't terrible? I think ANY team regardless of their average offense rushing output is allowed to run for that many yards that tells me you're rushing defense is terrible. You are a pure bred shit for brains if you actually believe that hogwash. It's called denial of factual reality Funk.

If you guys hold Navy to under 200 yards then I'll agree your Rushing Defense is good to mediocre.
Two defenses for comparison. SDSU and Utah.

Which team had almost no chance of stopping BYU's running game?

SDSU is terrible and Utah is not very good but at least had a chance of stopping BYU.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 05:31 PM   #23
RockyBalboa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 7,297
RockyBalboa is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to RockyBalboa
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Two defenses for comparison. SDSU and Utah.

Which team had almost no chance of stopping BYU's running game?

SDSU is terrible and Utah is not very good but at least had a chance of stopping BYU.
I will definetly agree that the Aztec rushing D is worse than the Utes.
__________________
Masquerading as Cougarguards very own genius dumbass since 05'.
RockyBalboa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 05:36 PM   #24
DrumNFeather
Active LDS Ute Fan
 
DrumNFeather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nantucket : )
Posts: 2,566
DrumNFeather is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cougjunkie View Post
Rocky Balboa: 3, Mpfunk: 0

Funk he is owning you right now.
Rocky is like the Stephen A. Smith of CG...he repeats himself over and over and gets louder and louder until his opponent gives up. It's an effective strategy, to be sure
__________________
"It's not like we played the school of the blind out there." - Brian Johnson.
DrumNFeather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 05:45 PM   #25
mpfunk
Senior Member
 
mpfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,619
mpfunk is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to mpfunk
Default

Again, let's look at results on the season.

Oregon St: 241 yards rushing, 5.5 ypc, 2 TDs.
Absolutely terrible game. I'll give you that one for sure. The Ute rushing defense looked pathetic against this team.

Air Force: 334 yards rushing, 5.3 ypc, 2 TDs.
Again terrible performance

At this point in the season, I would agree with Rocky's assessment

UCLA: 83 yards, 2.7 ypc, 0 TDs
First good performance of the year

UNLV: 196 yards, 4.3 ypc, 2 TDs
Terrible performance.

At this point is where you see the Utes starting to change players and start to get healthy.

Utah St: 136 yards, 3.0 ypc, 1 TD
This is actually an OK performance. Utes held Utah St to only 3 ypc which is solid. Utah St was slightly above their season average in yards, and below the season average in ypc

Louisville: 26 yards, 1.6 ypc, 1 TD
Not a bad performance at all.

San Diego St: 62 yards, 1.2 ypc, 1 TD
Good performance. Held 40 yards below season average, and nearly 2 yards below the season ypc.

TCU: 95 yards, 3.5 ypc, 1 TD
Good performance. Held TCU over 60 yards below season average for yards and below their average ypc.

CSU: 135 yards, 4.0 ypc, 0 TDs
I'd say this performance was pretty damn mediocre

WYoming: 37 yards, 1.2 ypc, 0 TDs
Very good performance

New Mexico: 81 yards, 2.6 ypc, 1 TD
Again good performance

BYU: 155 yards, 4.7 ypc, 1 TD
Utes did not play well with rush defense in this game.

Again these are not the stats of a terrible rush defense, these are the stats of a pretty mediocre rush defense. Since the Utes made a lot of changes on defense and got healthy (Long and Misi) there has been a vast improvement. At the beginning of the year they were terrible, at the end of the year they were mediocre.
mpfunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 05:48 PM   #26
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

So .... this is essentially an argument about whether a team's rush D is just "mediocre" or actually "terrible."

Sounds like a typical debate for a MWC team.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 04:05 AM   #27
BlueK
Senior Member
 
BlueK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,368
BlueK is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
Most likely. I'm 90% certain Paul Johnson will leave. He's a hot commodity. But he's making 1.5 million at Navy, so there is good reason for him to stay.
No sane person would leave anywhere to coach at SMU. No one. Johnson needs to stay put or wait for a better job. SMU will pay the money for him but they won't win.
BlueK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 12:21 PM   #28
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueK View Post
No sane person would leave anywhere to coach at SMU. No one. Johnson needs to stay put or wait for a better job. SMU will pay the money for him but they won't win.
Art Briles went to Baylor. Never say never.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.